Teams shows individual members talk to each other often are more effective than those whose mode of communication runs through the boss.
So says an MIT researcher who has studied patterns of industrial communication for the past decade. What Dr. Sandy Pentland has found is that the pattern of communication is more important than the specific talents of the individual team members. In other words, a team that communicates well is greater than the sum of its parts, while the team that rigidly adheres to old school ways of sharing information will fall short.
The analogy is a beehive, where the swarm actually is able to transfer data faster and in more usable bits than alternate systems can achieve. This fosters creativity and speeds idea innovation, Pentland’s research found.
Pentland’s paper, “The New Science of Building Great Teams,” is in this month’s Harvard Business Review. An alternate synopsis of the paper is here.
Good post, some talk at least is so important, but too much is way too much. So much depends on seating arrangements in an office: whose cube or office has proximity to whose. Keen to hear what others think of this research – particularly on this point!