My short answer is, I think there will be an impact, but it will swing toward more contact, not less. Indeed, after being cooped up for so long, I think people will crave human connections. Moreover, I don’t think it will have an effect on trade shows. In fact, I think this will reveal lots of holes/flaws in inter-/intra-company digital communications, which gives us all something to work on for the next quarantine (heaven forbid).
We aren’t the only ones contemplating what happens next. The Boston Globe this week published a piece in which several self-styled business futurists and science-fiction writers expect the world will look like next fall/winter.
I can’t say I’m impressed with most of their responses, which if anything feel exaggerated for effect. But see for yourself.
You’ve probably heard of turnkey PCB assembly, an all-in-one solution design and specifications are sent to the PCB manufacturer and they return the assembled PCBs to you (or your client) ready to use. It sounds convenient compared to doing all the legwork yourself, or having one of your engineers do it, but did you know that turnkey assembly also offers the shortest possible lead times for PCBs?
Let’s take a look at some of the ways that turnkey PCB assembly can shave time off of the design process and reduce turnaround time.
It Saves Engineers Time
Turnkey assembly saves engineers time in a couple of important ways. First, time spent hunting for components and availability is eliminated. Manufacturers that offer turnkey assembly have teams dedicated to component sourcing. This also extends to component substitution and BoM management. If something isn’t available, your turnkey team will be able to deal with substitutions for you and check that all substitutions are compatible with the overall design.
Second, and maybe an even bigger time savings, is the reduced communication load. When an engineer is organizing multiple component suppliers, a PCB fabricator, an assembler, and shipping among all of them, keeping everything sailing smoothly can eat a lot of time. Keep your PCB designers focused on their main job—designing and revising PCBs.
will mean that prototypes are designed, tested, and redesigned faster. No time
spent following developments with assembly; no logistics work organizing the
movement of boards or components between vendors.
With turnkey assembly, engineers have a single point of contact to deal with any and all questions related to the development of the product. They will keep you up-to-date on the process, and any changes that need to be made can be addressed quickly.
It Reduces Transportation Time
When dealing with multiple companies for every aspect of the production process, the time that goods spend moving from one stage to the next can really add up. Compare that with a turnkey assembly solution:
The PCB manufacturer already has ties with component suppliers and knows which parts to find from each one.
They have a store of common components already on hand and can handle component inventory storage for you.
The assembler is either in-house or nearby.
Instead of orchestrating businesses across borders and possibly continents, the entire process is localized, moving quickly from one stage to the next. That leaves shipping the final product as the only major shipping time.
There Are Fewer Quality Concerns
With a turnkey assembly solution, there are fewer quality concerns to deal with, especially when shipping between vendors.
In a multi-vendor scenario, if you instruct your PCB fabricator to ship your bare boards to an assembly house and they arrive with an error or a large percentage of damaged boards, your only option is to make a new order and wait. With turnkey assembly, this situation is impossible.
company you deal with is responsible for your project from PCB creation to
final testing, if they make a mistake with one step, they catch it and fix it
in the next. As we mentioned before, you have a single contact or team within
the manufacturer overseeing the progress of your order and checking for quality
at each stage.
to mention, you’re dealing with a single organization. Internal teams are
familiar with each other and have experience working together.
Miscommunications and mix-ups are reduced and it’s in the manufacturer’s best
interest to make sure that each stage supports the next and products move
through the process as efficiently as possible.
course, it’s possible to run into a bad manufacturer, which could cause you
even bigger problems than one bad vendor might. So, it’s important to vet your
potential manufacturer carefully, and find reviews or references if possible.
Scale Up Quickly
benefits go beyond the turnaround time for your initial prototype. Once you’re
satisfied with your PCBs, the manufacturer can immediately start to produce
them in quantity.
Think about it. Instead of juggling multiple suppliers and manufacturers to finish the prototypes and then searching for a manufacturer for production, you could finish prototyping quickly and move forward immediately with a company with which you have already developed a relationship.
Not all PCB manufacturers that offer turnkey assembly offer large-scale production, but if your needs fit with the manufacturer’s capacity, turnkey assembly could offer a truly seamless production process. Some manufacturers can even ship to clients for you or offer drop-shipping services.
With turnkey PCB assembly, you get a single, devoted team backing you up as you take a design from PCBs to working products. With less time spent on logistics and organization, you can expect much faster results. It could turn the design process around by reducing product turnaround.
Like all the companies we serve in the electronics design and manufacturing industry, we are closely watching the world’s response to Covid-19.
All UP MEDIA GROUP staff work remotely,
and our operations should continue as normal. As of this notice, our websites,
magazine issues, podcast and newsletter will be updated and published per the
schedule in our 2020 Media Kit.
We currently intend to hold the PCB2Day
workshops scheduled for June in Austin, TX. We will provide regular updates to
all sponsors, speakers and registrants as the situation on the ground becomes
PCB West 2020 at the Santa Clara (CA)
Convention Center remains on track to take place in September. Confirmation
letters to speakers are being sent this week, and our conference program and
registration will be available by early May.
The health of our employees, contributors
and customers is paramount. We will take any measures to ensure we do not
subject any staff, contributors or customers to unnecessary risks due to the
Let’s assume your
company has decided that transfer efficiency (TE) is the key metric in determining
solder paste quality. Transfer efficiency is the ratio of the volume of the
solder paste deposit divided by the volume of the stencil aperture. While you
agree that TE is an important metric, you are a little troubled with the recent
results in a solder paste evaluation. Two out of 10 pastes are fighting for the
top spot and it looks like TE will be the deciding metric. Paste A had a TE of
99.5% and Paste B had a TE of 99%. So management wants to go with paste A. You
are troubled because paste A has a poor response-to-pause. If it is left on the
stencil for 15 minutes or more the first print must be discarded. This weakness
may result in 30 minutes or so of lost production time in a 3-shift operation.
However, the TE test results showed that the TE of paste A was statistically significantly better than paste B. You think about this situation and something doesn’t make sense — 5% and 99% are quite close.
You dust off your statistics textbook and review hypothesis testing. Then it hits you, with very large sample sizes, means that are closer and closer together can be statistically significantly different.
The data show that paste A has a mean of 99.5% and a standard deviation of 10%, whereas paste B has a mean of 99% and also a standard deviation of 10%. The sample sizes were 10,000 samples each. These large sample sizes are important in the analysis. The standard error of the mean (SEM) is used to compare means in a hypothesis test. SEM is defined as the standard deviation (s) divided by the square root of the sample size (n):
So as the sample
size increases, the SEM becomes smaller or in statistics lingo “tighter.” With
very large sample sizes, this tightness enables the ability to distinguish
statistically between means that are closer and closer together. This situation
was not a concern with sample sizes of less than 100, however with the modern
solder paste volume scanning systems of today, sample sizes greater than 1000
Figure 1 shows the
expected sampling distribution of the mean for samples with a TE of 99.5% and
99.0% and a sample size of 100, both have a standard deviation of 10%. Note
that to your eye you do not see much difference. However, with the means and
standard deviations the same and sample sizes of 10,000 the sampling
distributions of the mean are clearly different in Figure 2.
though, is that there is no difference in the results in Figure 1 and 2. The
tiny difference in the means (0.5%) may be statistically significant with a
sample size of 10,000, but is it practically significant? Would this small
difference really matter in a production environment? Almost certainly not.
So, with large
sample sizes, we need to ask ourselves if the difference is practical. For TE,
I think we can be confident that a difference of 0.5% is not practically
significant. But, what if the difference was 2% or 5%? Clearly,
experiments should be performed to determine at what level a difference is
With the case
discussed above, I would much prefer the paste that has a 99.0% TE and a good
Foxconn, for once, was probably the first company in the electronics manufacturing sector to acknowledge the looming financial hit from the coronavirus. Apple, which relies on the Taiwanese ODM for the majority (?) of its production, was naturally forced to follow.
In a timely column on CIRCUITS ASSEMBLY, EMS expert Sue Mucha lays out a strategy for handling sharing bad news with suppliers and customers. “Transparency matters,” she says. “The goal shouldn’t be to paint a rosier picture than the situation dictates. The goal is to fill the communications void and establish trust that your company will provide news as the situation evolves.”
That begs the question, why haven’t more firms come forth with sales or profit warnings? Are Apple, Foxconn, Jabil and Plexus the only ones that will be affected? Or are they simply the vanguard?
I’m not one to make light of health epidemics, especially given that my college major was initially epidemiology. But the global slowdown in electronics demand — underscored by the earnings reports over the past couple months — is poised to worsen in the grip of the coronavirus outbreak, which started in China and has now reached more than a dozen more countries.
Among the electronics manufacturers affected at ground zero are Avnet, Siemens, and Foxconn. After Hubei issued a mandatory shutdown notice, Foxconn furloughed more than 13,000 workers at its campus there. (The plant generates an estimated $300 million in revenue per year.)
While electronics assembly plants can be brought back up to speed fairly quickly, the impact missing even a few days of revenues will be felt in the quarterly results. And here’s the possible silver lining.
Many companies have been reporting weaker results in the most recent quarter. For instance, Celestica’s revenues were down 14%, Amphenol’s dropped 3.3%, and Sanmina’s were off 16%. TTM went so far as to sell its entire mobility unit. Plexus saw sales rise, but is cutting an entire design unit. (UPDATE: Flex reported sales down 7%, adding to our picture of how widespread the weakness is.) Often the US-based firms see a slowdown in presidential election years as OEMs take conservative approaches to ordering ahead of potential administration changes. The outbreak, deadly and unwished for as it is, gives cover to management for any recurring revenue drops, at least for a quarter or two, and perhaps longer if the coronavirus gains a wider foothold. A cynical view, to be sure, but hardly an unrealistic one.
Already, airlines are bracing for lower capacity utilization and Asian firms are fearing the worst as businesses enact travel restrictions. Again as with SARS, the timing comes as Asia (and most of the world’s major economies) is experiencing tepid growth, and the best way to stop a recovery in its tracks is to sever the flow of goods and services.
For everyone’s sake, let’s hope this virus burns out fast.
Those who have been in the PCB industry since at least 2001 will likely remember the New York buyout firm known as Hicks, Muse, Tate & Furst. Better known as Hicks, Muse, they laid waste to the industry, buying up the largest fabrication shops like AT&T’s 400,000 sq. ft. plant in Richmond for dollars on the penny (you read that right), then attempting the same with EMS, before watching it all fall to pieces with multiple bankruptcies and revaluations. (The entity known as Viasystems eventually landed under the control of Tim Conlon, a highly capable executive who right-sized the company and made it profitable enough to sell to TTM in 2015.)
One of the beneficiaries of the merger mania in the late 1990s and early 2000s was Bob Herring.
Not once but twice, Herring built up and sold printed circuit board fabricators to larger bidders. The latter time, Herring sold Herco Technology and a second firm, Synthane Taylor, to Teradyne for about $122 million in stock.
You know how this ends. Teradyne’s stock collapsed, Herco was shuttered, and then came the lawsuits.
Herring later turned his sights to media, launching a news network that is popular in certain segments of the American public.
Tom Hicks of Hicks, Muse turned his sights on sports, buying — and bankrupting — the Dallas Stars hockey team and Texas Rangers baseball team, among others.